GI

Hi There , 

Im currently trying to use the TOGAF framework to implement an Application Architecture with ARIS.

We have just implemented ARIS, therefore im looking for sort of a best practice method .

At the moment we have multiple applications which I've consolidated into a single portfolio.

Im assuming that I will have to create access diagrams as well the applications systems type diagrams in order to model this architecture correctly. 

Before I begin mapping this architecture, I'd like to carry out a bit of an information gathering  session with all the relevant IT personal ,therefore I'd like to find out what sort of information I'm going to have to gather and how would I then apply it to these models ?

Thanks

 

 

by Linda Storm
Posted on Wed, 11/21/2012 - 16:55

I too have done this. What I did was create a 'Current acceptable technology catalog'  using [Architecture elements] groups by [Structural elements]. This allowed me to use the 'Generate model' option and reuse the elements over and over again.

My next issue is assigning specific attributes to both the [Architectural elements] and [Structural elements] so that the attribs are always the same for each, but the values are different.

Then I plan to version current and future views and hopefully perform a 'Model compare'.

 

Has anyone got a better idea?

0
by Sylvain Go
Posted on Wed, 03/06/2013 - 16:51

It's similar in my cases. But I have to split this approach in two different views :

  1. One to set the "Technical References" using a derived OT_APPL_SYS_TYPE Aris object (like your acceptable technology componant) in a huge symbol list (like Linux Debian 5 or MySQL 5.5 Enterprise for example).
  2. One to design the IT environments related to infrastructure platforms (virtual or not) - see the symbols scheme in a french Aris 7.1 version.

I fell in this pitfall at first : trying to detail virtual nodes than physical or represent network firewalls or routing equipement. That's the details Evil and doesn't bring more than use farm or DMZ symbols to group objects.

Then, I'm able to do relationships between instancied infra objects and each acceptable technology.

It's sounds like being the better way to request the Aris database and find dependances or obsolete technologies occurences, for example.

Hope it's a good introduction. It's a very deep subject !

 

samples of infrastructure objects selected

0

Featured achievement

Rookie
Say hello to the ARIS Community! Personalize your community experience by following forums or tags, liking a post or uploading a profile picture.
Recent Unlocks

Leaderboard

|
icon-arrow-down icon-arrow-cerulean-left icon-arrow-cerulean-right icon-arrow-down icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-arrow icon-back icon-close icon-comments icon-correct-answer icon-tick icon-download icon-facebook icon-flag icon-google-plus icon-hamburger icon-in icon-info icon-instagram icon-login-true icon-login icon-mail-notification icon-mail icon-mortarboard icon-newsletter icon-notification icon-pinterest icon-plus icon-rss icon-search icon-share icon-shield icon-snapchat icon-star icon-tutorials icon-twitter icon-universities icon-videos icon-views icon-whatsapp icon-xing icon-youtube icon-jobs icon-heart icon-heart2 aris-express bpm-glossary help-intro help-design Process_Mining_Icon help-publishing help-administration help-dashboarding help-archive help-risk icon-knowledge icon-question icon-events icon-message icon-more icon-pencil forum-icon icon-lock